Rachel M. Crook v. San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department et al
Plaintiff: Rachel M. Crook
Defendant: San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department, Victorville Police Department, T. Bechtol and 5 Male Unidentified
Case Number: 5:2022cv00010
Filed: January 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2022 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rachel M. Crook, upon Defendant 5 Male Unidentified served on 2/24/2022, answer due 3/17/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the reception clerk, a person of suitable age and discretion who works there, in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy. Original Summons NOT returned. (es)
February 28, 2022 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rachel M. Crook, upon Defendant San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department served on 2/24/2022, answer due 3/17/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Shelby C., a person of suitable age and discretion who works there, in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy. Original Summons NOT returned. (es)
February 28, 2022 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rachel M. Crook, upon Defendant Victorville Police Department served on 2/24/2022, answer due 3/17/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon reception clerk, a person of suitable age and discretion who works there in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy. Original Summons NOT returned. (es)
February 28, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rachel M. Crook, upon Defendant T. Bechtol served on 2/24/2022, answer due 3/17/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon reception clerk, a person of suitable age and discretion who works there, in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy. Original Summons NOT returned. (es)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order re Service of Complaint by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: re: Complaint - (Referred), #1 . SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS. (es)
February 7, 2022 Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Rachel Crook filed by Plaintiff Rachel M. Crook (es)
February 7, 2022 Filing 9 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $402.00 Final initial partial filing fee from plaintiff Rachel Crook on 2/7/2022, receipt number RS011631, re: Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #6 , Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #8 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (ram)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER RE "OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE INTERFERENCE" by Judge James V. Selna: Plaintiff's objection to Magistrate Judge Rosenbluth's "interference' is OVERRULED. If Plaintiff does not pay the filing fee or submit an IFP application by February 8, her lawsuit will be dismissed. re: Objection #7 . [See document for further details.] (es)
January 19, 2022 Filing 7 OBJECTION filed by Plaintiff Rachel M. Crook. (es)
January 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge James V. Selna: IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby: DENIED (see comments above). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: Plaintiff SHALL PAY THE FILING FEES IN FULL within 30 days or this case will be dismissed. Denying #3 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (es) Modified on 1/11/2022 (es).
January 5, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (lh)
January 3, 2022 Filing 4 DECLARATION of Beneficiary, Rachel Crook, to Waive all Filing Fees Recognized Under Her Guaranty of Free Justice and Open Courts, filed by Plaintiff Rachel M. Crook. (lh)
January 3, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed Under Judicial Notice of Appellant's Guaranty of Free Justice and Open Courts; Court is to Waive All Filing Fees, filed by Plaintiff Rachel M. Crook. (lh)
January 3, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rachel M. Crook, (lh)
January 3, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants 5 Male Unidentified, T. Bechtol, San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department, Victorville Police Department. Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Filed by Plaintiff Rachel M. Crook. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request) (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rachel M. Crook v. San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachel M. Crook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Victorville Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Bechtol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 5 Male Unidentified
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?