Duane Anthony Beyenhof v. Schwans Consumer Brands, Inc. et al
| Duane Anthony Beyenhof |
| Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc., DOES 1-100,, Schwans Consumer Brands, Inc. and Does 1-100 |
| 5:2022cv00043 |
| January 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Rozella A. Oliver. New Case Number 2:22-cv-192 MWF (RAOx). (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc., identifying The Schwan's Company. (Nesbit, Kristen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.. (Nesbit, Kristen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 21STCV44412 Receipt No: ACACDC-32590144 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint, #2 Answer to Complaint, #3 Declaration, #4 Declaration) (Attorney Kristen Jeannine Nesbit added to party Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.(pty:dft))(Nesbit, Kristen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
