BMW of North America, LLC et al v. Ramon Carra et al
BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG |
Ramon Carra an individual doing business as TopHatMiniMart and Does 1-10, inclusive |
5:2022cv00088 |
January 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Sheri Pym |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ramon Carra answer now due 3/25/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs BMW of North America, LLC; Bayerische Motoren Werke AG.(Chaney, Marcus) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff BMW of North America, LLC, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, upon Defendant Ramon Carra served on 2/4/2022, answer due 2/25/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Neira Carra, Mother/Co-Occupant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Diligence)(Chaney, Marcus) |
Filing 13 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva) |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to RAMON CARRA, an individual d/b/a TopHatMiniMart Ramon Carra. (yl) |
Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs BMW of North America, LLC, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG. (Chaney, Marcus) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (yl) |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs BMW of North America, LLC, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG. (Chaney, Marcus) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (lh) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by BMW of North America, LLC, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG. (Chaney, Marcus) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Plaintiffs BMW of North America, LLC, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (Chaney, Marcus) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs BMW of North America, LLC, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, (Chaney, Marcus) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs BMW of North America, LLC, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG. (Chaney, Marcus) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32620368 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs BMW of North America, LLC, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG. (Attorney Marcus F Chaney added to party BMW of North America, LLC(pty:pla), Attorney Marcus F Chaney added to party Bayerische Motoren Werke AG(pty:pla))(Chaney, Marcus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.