Dehua Venture Capital Investment Co., Ltd. et al v. Cuiwen et al
Petitioner: Dehua Venture Capital Investment Co., Ltd. and Deqing Dehua Equity Investment Fund Co., Ltd.
Respondent: Lin Cuiwen and Wang Xin
Case Number: 5:2022cv00108
Filed: January 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Respondents Lin Cuiwen, Wang Xin. (et)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (et)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,,,, #1 filed by Petitioner Dehua Venture Capital Investment Co., Ltd., Deqing Dehua Equity Investment Fund Co., Ltd.. (Magana, Thomas)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Lead Counsel changing lead counsel from Thomas J. Magaa to Scott T. Nonaka. filed by Petitioner Dehua Venture Capital Investment Co., Ltd., Deqing Dehua Equity Investment Fund Co., Ltd., (Magana, Thomas)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Dehua Venture Capital Investment Co., Ltd., Deqing Dehua Equity Investment Fund Co., Ltd., (Magana, Thomas)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioners Dehua Venture Capital Investment Co., Ltd., Deqing Dehua Equity Investment Fund Co., Ltd.. (Magana, Thomas)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION Receipt No: ACACDC-32639068 - Fee: $402, filed by Petitioner Dehua Venture Capital Investment Co., Ltd., Deqing Dehua Equity Investment Fund Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Notice of Interested Parties, #3 Declaration Declaration of Thomas J. Magaa, #4 Exhibit Ex A - DDEIF - Arbitral Award, #5 Exhibit Ex A-1 - DDEIF - Arbitral Award (English Translation), #6 Exhibit Ex A-2 - DDEIF Subscription Contract (English and Chinese), #7 Exhibit Ex A-3 - DDEIF Supplementary Agreement (English and Chinese), #8 Exhibit Ex A-4 DDEIF - CIETAC Letter, #9 Exhibit Ex B - DVIC - Arbitral Award, #10 Exhibit Ex B-1 DVIC Arbitral Award (English Translation), #11 Exhibit Ex B-2 DVIC Share TRansfer Agreement (English and Chinese), #12 Exhibit Ex B-3 DVIC Supplementary Agreement (English and Chinese), #13 Exhibit Ex B-4 DVIC Fuzhou Enforcement Ruling, #14 Proposed Order Proposed Judgment DDEIF Arbitral Award, #15 Proposed Order Proposed Judgment DVIC Arbitral Award) (Attorney Thomas James Magana added to party Dehua Venture Capital Investment Co., Ltd.(pty:pet), Attorney Thomas James Magana added to party Deqing Dehua Equity Investment Fund Co., Ltd.(pty:pet))(Magana, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dehua Venture Capital Investment Co., Ltd. et al v. Cuiwen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dehua Venture Capital Investment Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Thomas James Magana
Represented By: Scott T Nonaka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Deqing Dehua Equity Investment Fund Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Thomas James Magana
Represented By: Scott T Nonaka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lin Cuiwen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Wang Xin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?