Kelly Lorenz et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
| Kelly Lorenz and Alykhan Popat |
| County of San Bernardino, K. Ferber, M. Landavazo, J. Fisk, F. Harris, Superior Court of California for San Bernardino County, Lt. K. Ferber, Sgt. M. Landavazo, Deputy J. Fisk, Deputy F. Harris, Superior Court of California County of San Bernardino, Does 1 to 51, incluisive and San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department |
| 5:2022cv00143 |
| January 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 50 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #25 filed by plaintiffs Kelly Lorenz, Alykhan Popat. (Schlueter, Peter) |
Filing 49
ORDER CONTINUING FOR SEVEN DAYS THE TIME SBSC MUST RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #47 by Judge Percy Anderson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiffs' amended complaint on file in this action no later than seven days from the date of this Order. (lom)
|
|
Filing 48
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO PERMIT DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, DKT 25, WITHIN SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE COURT ISSUES AN ORDER ON THE PROPOSED STIPULATION #46 by Judge Percy Anderson. Plaintiffs and County Defendants hereby agree County Defendants will file an answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint no later than 7 days after the Court approves this Stipulation. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for details. (lom) Modified on 3/24/2022 (lom).
|
| Filing 47 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File SBSC's Response to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Superior Court of California County of San Bernardino. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Continuing for Seven Days the Time SBSC Must Respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint)(Naeve, Robert) |
| Filing 46 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, Dkt 25 filed by defendants County of San Bernardino, K. Ferber, J. Fisk, F. Harris, M. Landavazo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 44 TRANSCRIPT ORDER as to defendants County of San Bernardino, K. Ferber, J. Fisk, F. Harris, M. Landavazo for Court Reporter. Court will contact Lydia Dominguez at Lydia.Dominguez@lewisbrisbois.com with further instructions regarding this order. Transcript preparation will not begin until payment has been satisfied with the court reporter. (Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 43 TRANSCRIPT ORDER as to defendants County of San Bernardino, K. Ferber, J. Fisk, F. Harris, M. Landavazo for Court Reporter. Court will contact Lydia Dominguez at Lydia.Dominguez@lewisbrisbois.com with further instructions regarding this order. Transcript preparation will not begin until payment has been satisfied with the court reporter. (Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
|
Filing 45
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. On March 21, 2022, the Court conducted a Scheduling Conference setting forth the schedule of trial and pretrial dates. Based on the record before the Court, it appears that an early filing of a summary judgment motion on the application of qualified immunity to the officer defendants is appropriate. The Court sets the following deadlines for the briefing on the Individual Defendants' motion for summary judgment or partial summary judgment on the qualified immunity issue: Deadline for filing Defendants' Motion: June 6, 2022; Deadline for filing Plaintiffs' Opposition: June 20, 2022; Deadline for filing Defendants' Reply: June 27, 2022; Hearing on Defendants' Motion: July 11, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. The schedule already issued in this action is not affected by this Order. (lom)
|
|
Filing 42
CIVIL TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER [FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)] by Judge Percy Anderson. (lom)
|
|
Filing 41
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. Here, no party has filed a Notice of Related Cases, and defendants marked "No" on the Civil Cover Sheet's question asking if this case is related to... any civil or criminal case(s) previously filed in this court?" Because this action appears to satisfy one or more of the standards for finding this action "related" to the prior actions, the parties are ordered to show cause why: (1) they should not file a Notice of Related Cases as required by Local Rule 83-1.3 indicating that this action is related to the 2015 action discussed in the Notice of Removal; and (2) why the parties' respective counsel should not be sanctioned up to $2,000 for failing to file a Notice of Related Cases, as required by Local Rule 83-1.3. The parties' response to this Order to Show Cause shall be filed no later than April 6, 2022. (lom)
|
| Filing 40 MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by ZOOM held before Judge Percy Anderson. Dates set by the Court in this action are listed in the "Schedule of Trial and Pretrial Dates" attached to this order. The dates set by the Court are firm dates. Absent extraordinary circumstances, which must satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) and be brought to the Court's attention in a timely manner, the Court will not modify these dates. See minutes for details. Court Reporter: Phyllis Preston (video). (lom) |
|
Filing 39
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Percy Anderson. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than October 10, 2022. If the parties have not selected and obtained the consent of a Panel Mediator within twenty-one (21) days, the ADR Program will assign one. (lom)
|
| Filing 38 MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE via ZOOM held before Judge Percy Anderson. Court and counsel confer regarding the status of the case. For the reasons stated on the record, the Scheduling Conference is continued to March 21, 2022, at 2:00 p.m. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (iv) |
| Filing 37 NOTICE of Proof of Service of Superior Court Summons and Complaint Prior to Removal of Case (DF M. Landavazo) filed by plaintiffs Kelly Lorenz, Alykhan Popat. (Schlueter, Peter) |
| Filing 36 NOTICE of Proof of Service of Superior Court Summons and Complaint Prior to Removal of Case (DF F. Harris) filed by plaintiffs Kelly Lorenz, Alykhan Popat. (Schlueter, Peter) |
| Filing 35 NOTICE of Proof of Service of Superior Court Summons and Complaint Prior to Removal of Case (DF J. Fisk) filed by plaintiffs Kelly Lorenz, Alykhan Popat. (Schlueter, Peter) |
| Filing 34 NOTICE of Proof of Service of Superior Court Summons and Complaint Prior to Removal of Case (DF K. Ferber) filed by plaintiffs Kelly Lorenz, Alykhan Popat. (Schlueter, Peter) |
| Filing 33 NOTICE filed by plaintiffs Kelly Lorenz, Alykhan Popat. Notice of Proof of Service of Superior Court Summons and Complaint Prior to Removal of Case (DF San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department) (Schlueter, Peter) |
| Filing 32 NOTICE filed by plaintiffs Kelly Lorenz, Alykhan Popat. Notice of Proof of Service of Superior Court Summons and Complaint Prior to Removal of Case (DF San Bernardino County)) (Schlueter, Peter) |
| Filing 31 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Percy Anderson. The Scheduling Conference previously set for 3/14/2022 has been re-set for 3/17/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kss) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 30 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5, filed by Plaintiffs Kelly Lorenz, Alykhan Popat.. (Schlueter, Peter) |
|
Filing 29
ORDER DENYING RE CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE #28 by Judge Percy Anderson. (lom)
|
| Filing 28 STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from March 14, 2022 to May 16, 2022 filed by Defendant Superior Court of California County of San Bernardino. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Robert A. Naeve In Support Of Stipulation Continuing Scheduling Conference, #2 Proposed Order Continuing Scheduling Conference)(Naeve, Robert) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Complaint/Petition #25 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 19-1 Complaint/Petition includes more than 10 Does or fictitiously named parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
| Filing 25 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by plaintiffs Alykhan Popat, Kelly Lorenz (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Schlueter, Peter) |
|
Filing 26
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #24 by Judge Percy Anderson. The parties agreed Plaintiffs shall have up to and including February 21, 2022, within which to file a First Amended Complaint. (iv)
|
| Filing 24 STIPULATION to Amend filed by defendants County of San Bernardino, K. Ferber, J. Fisk, F. Harris, M. Landavazo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 23 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to J. Fisk answer now due 2/22/2022; County of San Bernardino answer now due 2/22/2022; F. Harris answer now due 2/22/2022; K. Ferber answer now due 2/22/2022; M. Landavazo answer now due 2/22/2022; Superior Court of California County of San Bernardino answer now due 2/22/2022, filed by defendants J. Fisk; County of San Bernardino; F. Harris; K. Ferber; M. Landavazo.(Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
|
Filing 22
SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (Scheduling Conference set for 3/14/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (See order for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 21
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See attached document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice (Other) #12 , Miscellaneous Document #5 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is For Judicial Notice and Joinder in Complaint. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 19 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Percy Anderson. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-00143 PA (JPRx). (ghap) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nathaniel P Garrett counsel for Defendant Superior Court of California for San Bernardino County. Adding Nathaniel P. Garrett as counsel of record for Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino. (Attorney Nathaniel P Garrett added to party Superior Court of California for San Bernardino County(pty:dft))(Garrett, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Robert A Naeve counsel for Defendant Superior Court of California for San Bernardino County. Adding Robert A. Naeve as counsel of record for Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino. (Attorney Robert A Naeve added to party Superior Court of California for San Bernardino County(pty:dft))(Naeve, Robert) |
| FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. ACACDC-32690225 for $402 filing fee. (Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Cary Donahue Sullivan counsel for Defendant Superior Court of California for San Bernardino County. Adding Cary Sullivan as counsel of record for Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino. (Attorney Cary Donahue Sullivan added to party Superior Court of California for San Bernardino County(pty:dft))(Sullivan, Cary) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants County of San Bernardino, Does 1 through 51, K. Ferber, J. Fisk, F. Harris, M. Landavazo, Superior Court of California County of San Bernardino. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Alykhan Popat, Kelly Lorenz. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/16/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE Of Joinder And Consent To Removal Of Action filed by Defendant Superior Court of California for San Bernardino County. (Naeve, Robert) |
| Filing 11 Request for Judicial Notice re: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendants County of San Bernardino, K. Ferber, J. Fisk, F. Harris, M. Landavazo. correcting Miscellaneous Document #5 (Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Dawn M Flores-Oster counsel for Defendants County of San Bernardino, K. Ferber, J. Fisk, F. Harris, M. Landavazo. Adding Matthew P. Harrison as counsel of record for County of San Bernardino, Lt. K. Ferber, Sgt. M. Landavazo, Deputy J. Fisk and F. Harris for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendants County of San Bernardino, Lt. K. Ferber, Sgt. M. Landavazo, Deputy J. Fisk and F. Harris. (Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Dawn M Flores-Oster counsel for Defendants County of San Bernardino, K. Ferber, J. Fisk, F. Harris, M. Landavazo. Adding Dana Alden Fox as counsel of record for County of San Bernardino, Lt. K. Ferber, Sgt. M. Landavazo, Deputy J. Fisk and F. Harris for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendants County of San Bernardino, Lt. K. Ferber, Sgt. M. Landavazo, Deputy J. Fisk and F. Harris. (Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendants County of San Bernardino, K. Ferber, J. Fisk, F. Harris, M. Landavazo, identifying County of San Bernardino, Lt. K. Ferber, Sgt. M. Landavazo, Deputy J. Fisk, F. Harris. (Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 6 Compendium of Exhibits re: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 (Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 5 re: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Matthew P. Harrison re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendants County of San Bernardino, K. Ferber, J. Fisk, F. Harris, M. Landavazo. (Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Dawn M. Flores-Oster re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendants County of San Bernardino, K. Ferber, J. Fisk, F. Harris, M. Landavazo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants County of San Bernardino, K. Ferber, J. Fisk, F. Harris, M. Landavazo. (Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVSB2126780 Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by defendants J. Fisk, County of San Bernardino, F. Harris, K. Ferber, M. Landavazo. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (Attorney Dawn M Flores-Oster added to party County of San Bernardino(pty:dft), Attorney Dawn M Flores-Oster added to party K. Ferber(pty:dft), Attorney Dawn M Flores-Oster added to party J. Fisk(pty:dft), Attorney Dawn M Flores-Oster added to party F. Harris(pty:dft), Attorney Dawn M Flores-Oster added to party M. Landavazo(pty:dft))(Flores-Oster, Dawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
