Jose Madriz v. Benihana Ontario Corp. et al
| Jose Madriz |
| Benihana Ontario Corp. and Does 1-10 |
| 5:2022cv00146 |
| January 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)]; SCHEDULING CONFERENCE [FRCP 26(f)] by Judge Percy Anderson. Scheduling Conference set for May 2, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. See order for details. (lom) |
| Filing 22 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Benihana Ontario Corp. (Cannizzaro, Charles) |
| Filing 21 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Benihana Ontario Corp..(Cannizzaro, Charles) |
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson. In light of the foregoing, the Court discharges the Order to Show Cause. The Court warns Plaintiff that if Defendant does not respond to the Complaint in accordance with the parties' stipulation, Plaintiff has until Wednesday March 23, 2022 to file an application for entry of default judgment against Defendant. The failure to file an application for entry of default judgment against Defendant by this date will result in the dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint without further warning. See minute order for details. (lom)
|
| Filing 19 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #17 by Clerk. The document is accepted as filed. (lom) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): No [Prop] Order. See L.R. 8-3 Response to Initial Complaint for format. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Benihana Ontario Corp. answer now due 3/21/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Benihana Ontario Corp..(Attorney Charles Michael Cannizzaro added to party Benihana Ontario Corp.(pty:dft))(Cannizzaro, Charles) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jose Madrizto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #15 (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Valenti, Matt) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson. In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before March 4, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See minute order for details. (lom)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court has reviewed the Response filed by plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel to the Court's Order to Show Cause #13 . For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lom)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jose Madrizto Order to Show Cause #11 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz, upon Defendant Benihana Ontario Corp. served on 1/28/2022, answer due 2/18/2022. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Valenti, Matt) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than February 10, 2022. (iv)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See attached document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Benihana Ontario Corp.. (car) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kss) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz, (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz. (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz. (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32676379 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Jose Madriz. (Attorney Matt D Valenti added to party Jose Madriz(pty:pla))(Valenti, Matt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
