Bryan Estrada v. Kwang Cho et al
Bryan Estrada |
Kwang Cho, Cucamonga Industrial Center, LLC, Kelly M. Arft, Does 1-10, inclusive, Best Outdoor Power Inland, LLC and Boris Sykes |
5:2022cv00276 |
February 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by plaintiff Bryan Estrada pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) without prejudice as to Kwang Cho. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 21 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Kelly M. Arft answer now due 4/28/2022; Cucamonga Industrial Center, LLC answer now due 4/28/2022, filed by Defendants Kelly M. Arft; Cucamonga Industrial Center, LLC.(Attorney David E Karlin added to party Kelly M. Arft(pty:dft), Attorney David E Karlin added to party Cucamonga Industrial Center, LLC(pty:dft))(Karlin, David) |
Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, upon Defendant Kwang Cho served on 3/14/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kwang Cho by Lillian Doe in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, upon Defendant Best Outdoor Power Inland, LLC served on 3/12/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Best Outdoor Power Inland, LLC in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, upon Defendant Boris Sykes served on 3/14/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Boris Sykes by Lilliana Doe in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, upon Defendant Cucamonga Industrial Center, LLC served on 3/14/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Cucamonga Industrial Center, LLC by Kelly M. Arft in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, upon Defendant Kelly M. Arft served on 3/14/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kelly M. Arft in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint/Petition #13 as to Defendant Kelly M. Arft, Best Outdoor Power Inland, LLC, Kwang Cho, Cucamonga Industrial Center, LLC, Boris Sykes. (yl) |
Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #13 filed by plaintiff Bryan Estrada. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 13 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by plaintiff Bryan Estrada(Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, upon Defendant Kwang Cho served on 2/27/2022, answer due 3/21/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kwang Cho by Jane Doe in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
![]() |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, upon Defendant Kelly M. Arft served on 2/17/2022, answer due 3/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kelly M. Arft in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, upon Defendant Cucamonga Industrial Center, LLC served on 2/17/2022, answer due 3/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Cucamonga Industrial Center, LLC in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendants Kelly M. Arft, Kwang Cho, Cucamonga Industrial Center, LLC, Does. (sh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (rolm) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (rolm) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (rolm) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Bryan Estrada. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32783175 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Bryan Estrada. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Bryan Estrada(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.