Misael Romero v. Luis Ontiveros et al
Misael Romero |
Lisa Ontiveros, Rita Ontiveros and Does 1-10, inclusive |
5:2022cv00284 |
February 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Sheri Pym |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Misael Romero. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Lisa Ontiveros, Rita Ontiveros. (ghap) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Misael Romero. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Misael Romero, (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Misael Romero. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32787741 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Misael Romero. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Misael Romero(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.