Martin Vargas v. U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement et al
Martin Vargas |
U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Inspector General, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Department of Homeland Security |
5:2022cv00287 |
February 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Sheri Pym |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Department of Homeland Security answer now due 4/29/2022; United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement answer now due 4/29/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Department of Homeland Security; United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.(Attorney Ryan Casey Chapman added to party Department of Homeland Security(pty:dft), Attorney Ryan Casey Chapman added to party United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement(pty:dft))(Chapman, Ryan) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed Martin Vargas, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Front Desk/Reception/Mail Room. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to USPS confirms "Individual Picked Up at Postal Facility". Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to USPS indicates "Left with Individual". Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Khaled Alrabe)(Meyers, Joseph) |
Filing 12 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva) |
Filing 11 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 5:20-cv-00768-TJH(PVCx) (ap) |
Filing 10 30 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Department of Homeland Security. (et) |
Filing 9 30 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (et) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (et) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Martin Vargas. (Meyers, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Martin Vargas. (Meyers, Joseph) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Martin Vargas, (Meyers, Joseph) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Martin Vargas. (Meyers, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32802706 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Martin Vargas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Special Master R&R, #2 Exhibit B. ICE FOIA Denial, #3 Exhibit C. Administrative appeal, #4 Exhibit D. ICE appeal response) (Attorney Joseph Carl Meyers added to party Martin Vargas(pty:pla))(Meyers, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.