Cindi E. Denton v. Ford Motor Company
Cindi E Denton |
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
5:2022cv00311 |
February 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Hernan D Vera |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL #21 by Judge Hernan D. Vera. The entire above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms and conditions of the written Settlement Agreement entered into between the Parties. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) |
Filing 21 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Plaintiff Cindi E Denton. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Camran Kyle Pakbaz added to party Cindi E Denton(pty:pla))(Pakbaz, Camran) |
Filing 20 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera. (cbr) |
Filing 19 TEXT ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Hernan D. Vera. Pursuant to the parties' Notice of Settlement #18 , all dates and deadlines are hereby vacated in this matter. The parties are ordered to file a Stipulation re Dismissal no later than 9/11/2023. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Settlement JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT filed by Kevin Jacobson Cindi E Denton. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
Filing 17 REASSIGNMENT ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera: Please refer to Order for complete details. (cbr) |
Filing 16 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#23-070) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Hernan D. Vera, this case is transferred from Judge Dolly M. Gee to the calendar of Judge Hernan D. Vera for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:22-cv-00311-HDV-AFMx. (rn) |
Filing 15 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 7/25/2023. Joint status report re settlement due by 8/1/2023. (gk) |
Filing 14 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/22/2023 02:00 PM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. Jury Trial set for 9/26/2023 08:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. See document for further details. (Attachments: #1 Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates) (gk) |
Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court sua sponte VACATES the Scheduling Conference set on April 8, 2022. A Scheduling and Case Management Order to issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Cindi E Denton.. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
Filing 11 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/25/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 4/8/2022 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 21-01 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 5:22-cv-00311 DMG(AFMx). (rn) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Christina A. Snyder. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-00311 CAS (AFMx). (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Cindi E Denton in San Bernardino Superior Court on 11/17/2021, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
NON CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, attached as Exhibit B1.(jtil) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Jury Demand #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 served on 2/18/2022. (Espinosa, Carmen) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY, (Espinosa, Carmen) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY.. (Espinosa, Carmen) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Espinosa, Carmen) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino, case number CIVSB2133565 Receipt No: ACACDC-32816593 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Carmen G. Espinosa, #2 Exhibit Decl. Ex. A - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit Decl. Ex. B - Answer, #4 Exhibit Decl. Ex. C 10-K Filing, #5 Exhibit Decl. Ex. D - Purchase Agreement, #6 Exhibit Decl. Ex. E - All Pleadings) (Attorney Carmen G Espinosa added to party FORD MOTOR COMPANY(pty:dft))(Espinosa, Carmen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.