Gary Bernard Parker v. Craig Koenig et al
Petitioner: Gary Bernard Parker
Respondent: Craig Koenig and Xavier Becerra
Case Number: 5:2022cv00323
Filed: February 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Christina A Snyder
Referring Judge: Gail J Standish
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Directing Briefing on Motion to Dismiss by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: re: The Court is in receipt of Respondent's motion to dismiss filed today [Dkts. #8 - #9 ,"Motion"]. The Motion argues that this action should be dismissed on the grounds that the Petition is and unauthorized second or successive petition and is untimely. IT IS ORDERED THAT Petitioner's Opposition to the Motion is due by May 4, 2022. Respondent's Reply will be due within 14 days of the docketing date of theOpposition. [See document for further details.] (et)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #8 (Attachments: #1 Lodgment No. 1, #2 Lodgment No. 2, #3 Lodgment No. 3, #4 Lodgment No. 4, #5 Lodgment No. 5, #6 Lodgment No. 6, #7 Lodgment No. 7, #8 Lodgment No. 8, #9 Lodgment No. 9, #10 Lodgment No. 10, #11 Lodgment No. 11, #12 Lodgment No. 12, #13 Lodgment No. 13, #14 Lodgment No. 14, #15 Lodgment No. 15, #16 Lodgment No. 16)(Jacobson, Lise)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by respondent Craig Koenig. (Jacobson, Lise)
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lise S Jacobson counsel for Respondent Craig Koenig. Adding Lise Simons Jacobson as counsel of record for Craig Koenig, Warden, et. al. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by respondent Craig Koenig, Warden, et. al.. (Attorney Lise S Jacobson added to party Craig Koenig(pty:res))(Jacobson, Lise)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. Respondent must file an Answer within sixty days from the date of this order. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be within forty-file days from the date of this order. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 of 2, #2 Attachment 2 of 2) (es)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 Letter RE Habeas Corpus Transfer-In (CV-38)) (rolm)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORIGINAL file, copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Southern (rolm).
November 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Central District of California. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California*.*255 East Temple Street**Los Angeles, CA 90012-3332*. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 11/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) [Transferred from California Southern on 2/22/2022.]
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Trust Account for Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gary Bernard Parker. (jms) [Transferred from California Southern on 2/22/2022.]
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against Craig Koenig, Xavier Becerra, filed by Gary Bernard Parker. ($5.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-2141-CAB-AHG. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening] (jms)(jrd) [Transferred from California Southern on 2/22/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gary Bernard Parker v. Craig Koenig et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gary Bernard Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Craig Koenig
Represented By: Lise S Jacobson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Xavier Becerra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?