Broque Anthony Anderson v. WVDC Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Department et al
Plaintiff: Broque Anthony Anderson
Defendant: WVDC Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Department, Seargent Doe, Deputy Doe and Deputy Doe No. 2
Case Number: 5:2022cv00377
Filed: February 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Karen E Scott
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge John A. Kronstadt that the request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is hereby DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for the following reasons: (1) Legally and/or factually patently frivolous. Pleas see attachment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) (jp)
March 2, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (et)
February 25, 2022 Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Broque Anthony Anderson. (et)
February 25, 2022 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Deputy Doe(Deputy of West Valley Detention Center, official capacity), Deputy Doe (individual), Deputy Doe No. 2 (Deputy of West Valley Detention Center, official capacity), Deputy Doe No. 2(individual), Seargent Doe (Seargent Sheriff Department, official capacity), Seargent Doe (individual), WVDC Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Department pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott., filed by Plaintiff Broque Anthony Anderson. (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Broque Anthony Anderson v. WVDC Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Broque Anthony Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WVDC Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seargent Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Doe No. 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?