Anthony Carlos v. GXO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. et al.
Anthony Carlos |
GXO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
5:2022cv00418 |
March 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Terry J Hatter |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 9 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) -NEW CASE BEFORE JUDGE HATTER: This action has been assigned to the calendar of the HONORABLE TERRY J. HATTER, JR., United States District Judge. Please include the initials TJH in all documents pertaining to this case, as documents are routed using the judges initials, it is imperative that the correct initials TJH be used on all subsequent filings to prevent any delays in the processing of documents. Counsel shall not attempt to contact the Court or its chambers staff by telephone or by any other ex parte means, although counsel may contact the Courtroom Deputy, Yolanda Skipper, at:yolanda_skipper@cacd.uscourts.gov, with appropriate inquiries. She can be reached at (213) 894-5276. Judge Hatters courtroom is located on the 9th Floor, 350 W. 1st Street, United States Courthouse, Courtroom No. 9B. Additional information about Judge Hatters procedures and schedules can be found on the courts website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. COUNSEL: READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for more information. (shb) |
![]() |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (sh) |
NON-CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant GXO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. Jury Demanded. [FILED IN STATE DATE NOT INDICATED SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 2 AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1-3 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, GXO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Anthony Carlos. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 01/04/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 1 AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1-2 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant GXO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on March 7, 2022. (Johnson, Timothy) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant GXO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc., identifying GXO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc.. (Johnson, Timothy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant GXO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc.. (Johnson, Timothy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number CVRI2200025 Receipt No: ACACDC-32905606 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant GXO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jesse C. Ferrantella in Support of Defendant's Notice of Removal of Civil Action to United States Federal Court, #2 Exhibit 1- Complaint Packet, #3 Exhibit 2-Answer to Complaint, #4 Declaration of Waite Hamrick in Support of Defendant's Notice of Removal of Civil Action to United States Federal Court) (Attorney Timothy L Johnson added to party GXO Logistics Supply Chain, Inc.(pty:dft))(Johnson, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.