Vidal Coronel v. Mercedes Benz USA LLC et al.
| Vidal Coronel |
| Mercedes Benz USA LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 5:2022cv00419 |
| March 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #9 . by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 13 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Mercedes Benz USA LLC amending Amended Complaint/Petition, #9 , filed by Plaintiff Vidal Coronel (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Altman, Bryan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Vidal Coronel, identifying Maid to Clean Vacations, Inc.. (Altman, Bryan) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Complaint/Petition #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Stipulations - Order. Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 9 [JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES filed as] First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Does, Mercedes Benz USA LLC amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiff Vidal Coronel(Altman, Bryan) Modified on 4/15/2022 (lom). |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Mercedes Benz USA LLC answer now due 4/13/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz USA LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (sh) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Mercedes Benz USA LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Vidal Coronel. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 02/02/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1-1 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz USA LLC, identifying Daimler North America Corporation. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz USA LLC identifying Daimler North America Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz USA LLC. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number CVPS2200454 Receipt No: ACACDC-32907444 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz USA LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Mercedes Benz USA LLC(pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
