Kevin Y. Jin v. Rafael Velasquez
Kevin Y. Jin and Mary Lim |
Rafael Velasquez, Juan Jose Gonzalez, Sandoval Juan Jose Gonzalez, Martha Melcher, Larry Valdez, Anthony T. Case, Maxine D. Harvey and Sandra Hum |
5:2022cv00421 |
March 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb: Denying #2 APPLICATION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Complaint without Prejudice. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (twdb) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (jtil) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiffs Kevin Y. Jin, Mary Lim. (jtil) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiffs Mary Lim, Kevin Y. Jin against Defendant Anthony T. Case, Juan Jose Gonzalez, Sandoval Juan Jose Gonzalez, Maxine D. Harvey, Sandra Hum, Martha Melcher, Larry Valdez, Rafael Velasquez. Case assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (Attachments: #1 Complaint Pt. 2, #2 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.