Arturo Rodriguez v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc et al
Plaintiff: Arturo Rodriguez
Defendant: Real Time Resolutions Inc, RRA CP OPPORTUNITY TRUST 1, ZBS Law, LLP, Real Time Resolutions, Inc and Does 1-100 inclusive
Case Number: 5:2022cv00453
Filed: March 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Sheri Pym
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2022 Filing 24 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) filed by Plaintiff Arturo Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(McFarlin, Timothy)
April 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Request for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. #18 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton. (See document for further information). (jp)
April 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER VACATING Hearing on Plaintiff's Request for Preliminary Inunction (Doc. #18 ) and Taking Matter Under Submission by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court has determined that the motion is appropriate for decision without oral argument, VACATES the hearing set for 4/29/2022 at 10:30 AM., and takes the matter under submission. (jp)
April 20, 2022 Filing 21 REPLY in response to Opposition to Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Arturo Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Proof of Service)(McFarlin, Timothy)
April 13, 2022 Filing 20 BRIEF filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc. OPPOSITION regarding Brief (non-motion non-appeal) #18 . (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Samuel Trakhtenbroit, #2 Declaration A to Decl of Trakhtenbroit, #3 Declaration B to Decl of Trakhtenbroit, #4 Exhibit C to Decl of Trakhtenbroit, #5 Exhibit D to Decl of Trakhtenbroit, #6 Exhibit E to Decl of Trakhtenbroit, #7 Exhibit F to Decl of Trakhtenbroit, #8 Exhibit G to Decl of Trakhtenbroit, #9 Exhibit H to Decl of Trakhtenbroit, #10 Memorandum Request for Judicial Notice, #11 Exhibit 1 to RJN, #12 Exhibit 2 to RJN, #13 Exhibit 3 to RJN, #14 Exhibit 4 to RJN, #15 Exhibit 5 to RJN)(Lucey, Nathaniel)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING IN PART JOINT STIPULATION TO RESET BRIEFING SCHEDULE OR CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION REQUESTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (DOC. #16 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton that the Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall be reset to 4/13/2022. The Plaintiff's last day to file his Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall be reset to 4/20/2022. (jp)
April 1, 2022 Filing 18 BRIEF filed by Plaintiff Arturo Rodriguez. regarding Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Hearing, #13 . (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service)(McFarlin, Timothy)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 5/20/2022 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
March 31, 2022 Filing 16 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File File Opposition filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc. Request set for hearing on 4/29/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lucey, Nathaniel)
March 31, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Hearing - under Category - Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests. (2) Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. (3) Proposed Order shall be filed as separate attachment to the e-filed "NOTICE OF LODGING and/or REQUEST" and e-mailed to Judge Staton generic email addresses a Microsoft Word version of the document. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp)
March 30, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE Request for Alternate Briefing Schedule for Hearing on Order to Show Cause re Hearing on Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendants Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (Lucey, Nathaniel)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING Briefing Schedule on Preliminary Injunction by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court sets a hearing on whether a preliminary injunction shall issue for 4/29/2022 at 10:30 AM. Plaintiff shall file an Opening Brief on or before 4/1/2022; Defendant shall file an Opposition on or before 4/8/2022; and Plaintiff shall file any Reply on or before 4/15/2022. (jp)
March 25, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE Request for Hearing on Order to Show Cause Re: Hearing on Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendants Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (Lucey, Nathaniel)
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTES (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re Hearing on Preliminary Injunction by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court ORDERS Defendants to apprise the court within three (3) days as to whether a hearing on the issuance of a preliminary injunction is necessary, or whether Defendants agree that they will not foreclose on the property until resolution of this action or until otherwise permitted by court order. (jp)
March 16, 2022 Filing 10 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court, on its own motion, hereby continues the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #9 currently set for August 1, 2022 at 10:30 a.m. to August 5, 2022 at 10:30 a.m. Counsel is reminded to refer to Judge Statons Procedures and Schedules page prior to filing future motions. Civil motions are heard on Fridays at 10:30 a.m. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 15, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Arturo Rodriguez filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/1/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Memorandum Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Exhibit 1- To RJN, #4 Exhibit 2- to RJN) (Lucey, Nathaniel)
March 15, 2022 Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku)
March 15, 2022 Filing 7 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (Lucey, Nathaniel)
March 15, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap)
March 15, 2022 Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
March 15, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
March 15, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Josephine L. Staton. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-00453 JLS (SPx). (ghap)
March 14, 2022 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, Inclusive, RRA CP Opportunity Trust 1, Real Time Resolutions, Inc, ZBS Law, LLP., filed by plaintiff Arturo Rodriguez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/16/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
March 14, 2022 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Arturo Rodriguez, upon Defendant ZBS Law, LLP served on 2/22/2022, answer due 3/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Authorized to accept-Robert B Norum-Attorney in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/23/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT E) (ghap)
March 14, 2022 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Arturo Rodriguez, upon Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc served on 2/22/2022, answer due 3/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System-Agent for Service-Daisy M.-Intake Clerk in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/28/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT G) (ghap)
March 14, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions Inc, (Lucey, Nathaniel)
March 14, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number CVRI 2200659 Receipt No: BCACDC-32940343 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant RRA CP OPPORTUNITY TRUST 1, Real Time Resolutions Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L) (Attorney Nathaniel R Lucey added to party RRA CP OPPORTUNITY TRUST 1(pty:dft), Attorney Nathaniel R Lucey added to party Real Time Resolutions Inc(pty:dft))(Lucey, Nathaniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arturo Rodriguez v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arturo Rodriguez
Represented By: Timothy George McFarlin
Represented By: Fernando Leone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Real Time Resolutions Inc
Represented By: Nathaniel R Lucey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RRA CP OPPORTUNITY TRUST 1
Represented By: Nathaniel R Lucey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ZBS Law, LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Real Time Resolutions, Inc
Represented By: Nathaniel R Lucey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-100 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?