Leticia Ramirez v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| Leticia Ramirez |
| Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 5:2022cv00472 |
| March 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV22-472 KES on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
|
|
Filing 13
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Lynn M Harada added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Harada, Lynn)
|
|
Filing 12
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Leticia Ramirez. (Rosales, Steven)
|
|
Filing 11
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Leticia Ramirez, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 3/29/2022, answer due 6/27/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of Regional Counsel,. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Rosales, Steven)
|
|
Filing 10
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, See document for details. (es)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . See document for details. (es)
|
|
Filing 8
60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (es)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED. Granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (es)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Leticia Ramirez, (Rosales, Steven)
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Leticia Ramirez. (Rosales, Steven)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Leticia Ramirez. (Rosales, Steven)
|
|
Filing 2
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Leticia Ramirez. (Rosales, Steven)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Leticia Ramirez. (Attorney Steven G Rosales added to party Leticia Ramirez(pty:pla))(Rosales, Steven)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
