Raymond Villa v. Wesley Simmons et al
Raymond Villa |
Wesley Simmons, Alex Blanco, Franklin Ike and John Doe |
5:2022cv00579 |
March 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 DECLARATION of Raymond Villa filed by Plaintiff Raymond Villa. (hr) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION to Reconsider #11 filed by Plaintiff Raymond Villa. (hr) |
Filing 12 DECLARATION in Support of MOTION to Reconsider #11 filed by Plaintiff Raymond Villa. (hr) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Reconsider Order re Appointment of Counsel #9 filed by Plaintiff Raymond Villa. (hr) |
Filing 10 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $50.00 initial partial filing fee from plaintiff Raymond Villa on 05/04/2022, receipt number LA238057, re: Order on Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees (CV60P),, #7 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (jo) |
Filing 9 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT COUNSEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE (#4) by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian: Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED without prejudice #4 . (et) |
Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER RE: PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian for pretrial proceedings. Except as otherwise specified in paragraph 1 below, all future documents submitted in this case shall be addressed to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street,Room 180 (Terrace Level), Los Angeles, CA 90012-1565. [See Order for details.] (et) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian: granting #5 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. Re REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #5 . It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $5.00 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Raymond Villa. (lh) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, filed by Plaintiff Raymond Villa. (lh) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Current Facts and Unusual Circumstances with Supporting Dcoumentss re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), #1 filed by Plaintiff Raymond Villa. (lh) |
Filing 2 DECLARATION of Raymond Villa filed by Plaintiff Raymond Villa. (lh) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Alex Blanco(Detective, Chino Police Department, official capacity), Alex Blanco(Detective, Chino Police Department, individual ), John Doe, John Doe, Franklin Ike(Corporal, Chino Police Department, official capacity), Franklin Ike(Corporal, Chino Police Department, individual), Wesley Simmons pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Filed by Plaintiff Raymond Villa. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request, #2 Proposed Order) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.