Megan Lane v. Barclays Bank Delaware et al
| Megan Lane |
| Barclays Bank Delaware and Equifax Information Services, LLC |
| 5:2022cv00646 |
| April 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC, identifying Equifax, Inc.. (Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Equifax Information Services, LLC answer now due 6/8/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Attorney Thomas P Quinn, Jr added to party Equifax Information Services, LLC(pty:dft))(Quinn, Thomas) |
Filing 13
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Megan Lane, upon Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 4/20/2022, answer due 5/11/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Megan Lane. upon Barclays Bank Delaware waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/20/2022, answer due 6/21/2022. Waiver of Service signed by Jonathan Marmo. (Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware. (twdb) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (twdb) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Megan Lane. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons on Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC)(Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Megan Lane, identifying Law Offices of Robert S. Gitmeid, P.C.; Law Offices of Robert S. Gitmeid & Assoc., PLLC. (Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (et) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Megan Lane. (Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33128296 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Megan Lane. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (Attorney Stanley Robert Apps added to party Megan Lane(pty:pla))(Apps, Stanley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
