The Tamarisk Rd. Trust UDT 8/9/2020, PROPER T VIEW, INC as Trustee v. Michael J. Prieto et al
| The Tamarisk Rd. Trust UDT PROPER T VIEW, INC as Trustee |
| Michael J. Prieto and Does 1-10 |
| 5:2022cv00650 |
| April 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Sheri Pym |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #10 filed by Plaintiff The Tamarisk Rd. Trust UDT 8/9/2020, PROPER T VIEW, INC as Trustee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit L)(Katz, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 18
REPLY NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #10 filed by Plaintiff The Tamarisk Rd. Trust UDT 8/9/2020, PROPER T VIEW, INC as Trustee. (Katz, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 17
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: NOTICE TO PARTIES by District John W. Holcomb. Effective Monday, May 23, 2022, Judge John W. Holcomb will be located in the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, Courtroom 9D, on the 9th Floor, located at 411 W. 4th Street, Santa Ana, California 92701-4516. All Court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 9D of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse unless otherwise ordered by the Court. All required mandatory chambers copies shall be delivered and placed in the drop box located on the 9th Floor of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse. Judge Holcomb's Courtroom Deputy Clerk, may be reached at JWH_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 16
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #10 in Support of Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Defendant Michael J. Prieto. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL J. PRIETO'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BASED FEDERAL COURT EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION, #2 Exhibit OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL J. PRIETO'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BASED ON (1) POSSESSORY INTEREST OF DEFENDANT AS LESSOR; AND (2) LACK OF COMPLIANCE WITH LEASE, #3 Exhibit Trust Patent)(Bauer, Bruce)
|
|
Filing 15
MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Bauer, Bruce)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #10 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Katz, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 13
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff The Tamarisk Rd. Trust UDT 8/9/2020, PROPER T VIEW, INC as Trustee, (Katz, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 12
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #10 filed by Plaintiff The Tamarisk Rd. Trust UDT 8/9/2020, PROPER T VIEW, INC as Trustee. (Attachments: #1 Appendix INDEX OF RJN EXHIBITS, #2 Exhibit EXH A, #3 Exhibit EXH B, #4 Exhibit EXH C, #5 Exhibit EXH D, #6 Exhibit EXH E, #7 Exhibit EXH F, #8 Exhibit EXH G, #9 Exhibit EXH H, #10 Exhibit EXH I, #11 Exhibit EXH J, #12 Exhibit EXH K)(Katz, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 11
DECLARATION of DANIEL E. KATZ in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #10 filed by Plaintiff The Tamarisk Rd. Trust UDT 8/9/2020, PROPER T VIEW, INC as Trustee. (Katz, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court filed by Plaintiff The Tamarisk Rd. Trust UDT 8/9/2020, PROPER T VIEW, INC as Trustee. Motion set for hearing on 6/17/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge John W. Holcomb. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Daniel Elliot Katz added to party The Tamarisk Rd. Trust UDT 8/9/2020, PROPER T VIEW, INC as Trustee(pty:pla)) (Katz, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
|
|
Filing 8
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Michael J. Prieto, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 4/18/2022. (Murphy, Shaun)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): It appears Attorney Shaun M Murphys CM/ECF login was used to e-file the complaint in this case for Attorney Bruce T Bauer, the attorney who represents the defendant. Mr. Murphy did not sign the complaint. This substitute e-filing practice violates Local Rule 5-4.3.4(e).. (rolm)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (rolm)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (rolm)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (rolm)
|
|
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Michael J. Prieto, filed by plaintiff The Tamarisk Rd. Trust UDT 8/9/2020, PROPER T VIEW, INC as Trustee. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/14/2021 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT 1-1 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (rolm)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Michael J. Prieto, identifying United States of America. (Murphy, Shaun)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Michael J. Prieto. (Murphy, Shaun)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number UDPS2100639 Receipt No: ACACDC-33132181 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Michael J. Prieto. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint) (Attorney Shaun M Murphy added to party Michael J. Prieto(pty:dft))(Murphy, Shaun)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
