Jaimie Hernandez v. The Dress Barn, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jaimie Hernandez
Defendant: The Dress Barn, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2022cv00656
Filed: April 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jesus G Bernal
Referring Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Jaimie Hernandez. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Carpenter, Todd)
April 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
April 28, 2022 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jaimie Hernandez, upon Defendant The Dress Barn, Inc. served on 4/20/2022, answer due 5/11/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Koy Saechao, Service of Process Intake Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Carpenter, Todd)
April 15, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant The Dress Barn, Inc. (car)
April 15, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
April 15, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
April 15, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (car)
April 15, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Jaimie Hernandez. (Carpenter, Todd)
April 15, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jaimie Hernandez, identifying Plaintiff: Jaimie Hernandez, Defendant: The Dress Barn, Inc., and Counsel: Lynch Carpenter, LLP. (Carpenter, Todd)
April 15, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jaimie Hernandez. (Carpenter, Todd)
April 15, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33137944 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Jaimie Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration of Jurisdiction) (Attorney Todd D Carpenter added to party Jaimie Hernandez(pty:pla))(Carpenter, Todd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jaimie Hernandez v. The Dress Barn, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jaimie Hernandez
Represented By: Scott Gregory Braden
Represented By: Todd D Carpenter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Dress Barn, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?