Johnny Shaw v. Bloomfield
Petitioner: Johnny Shaw
Respondent: Bloomfield
Case Number: 5:2022cv00669
Filed: April 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2022 Filing 14 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Johnny Shaw. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 . Receipt number LA239555. (fr)
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim: granting #12 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File. Petitioner's reply is due on or before August 17, 2022. (hr)
June 2, 2022 Filing 12 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File Reply filed by Petitioner Johnny Shaw. (hr)
May 19, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Return to Habeas Petition (2254) #10 (Attachments: #1 Lod. 1 (CT1).pdf, #2 Lod. 1 (CT2)_Part1.pdf, #3 Lod. 1 (CT2)_Part2.pdf, #4 Lod. 1 (CT2)_Part3.pdf, #5 Lod. 1 (CT3)_Part1.pdf, #6 Lod. 1 (CT3)_Part2.pdf, #7 Lod. 2 (RT).pdf, #8 Lod. 3 (AOB).pdf, #9 Lod. 4 (RB).PDF, #10 Lod. 5 (ARB).pdf, #11 Lod. 6 (Supp AOB).pdf, #12 Lod. 7 (Supp RB).pdf, #13 Lod. 8 (Supp ARB).pdf, #14 Lod. 9 (Opinion).PDF, #15 Lod. 10 (Petition for Review).pdf, #16 Lod. 11 (Petition for Review Denied).pdf, #17 Lod. 12 Resentencing CT.pdf, #18 Lod. 13 Resentencing RT.pdf, #19 Lod. 14 (AOB) E075960.pdf, #20 Lod. 15 RB E075960.pdf, #21 Lod. 16 (ARB) E075960.pdf, #22 Lod. 17 (Opinion) E075960.pdf, #23 Lod. 18 (Petition for Review).pdf, #24 Lod. 19 (S270511 Docket Denial).pdf, #25 Lod. 20 (E072290 - Petition)_Part1.pdf, #26 Lod. 20 (E072290 - Petition)_Part2.pdf, #27 Lod. 21 (E072290-Informal Response).pdf, #28 Lod. 22 (WHC2000230 Petition).pdf, #29 Lod. 23 (S262080 Petition).pdf, #30 Lod. 24 (WHC2000230 Order Denying Petition).pdf, #31 Lod. 25 (S262080 Docket Denial).pdf, #32 Lod. 26 (E072290 Order Denying Petition).pd, #33 Lod. 27 (S269558 - Petition).pdf, #34 Lod. 28 (S269558 Docket Denial).pdf)(LaPietra, Vincent)
May 19, 2022 Filing 10 ANSWER to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 filed by Respondent Bloomfield. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus)(LaPietra, Vincent)
May 9, 2022 Filing 9 STATEMENT Re Filing Fee filed by Petitioner Johnny Shaw (hr)
May 9, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Vincent P. LaPietra on behalf of Respondent Bloomfield. (Attorney Vincent P LaPietra added to party Bloomfield(pty:res))(LaPietra, Vincent)
April 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (Attachments: #1 Petition (part 1), #2 Petition (part 2), #3 Petition (part 3), #4 Petition (part 4), #5 Signed Consent, #6 Consent Form, #7 Local Rules Digest) (clee)
April 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL #3 by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel (ECF #3 ) is DENIED without prejudice. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (clee)
April 25, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (lh)
April 18, 2022 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT in Support, Petitioners Motion for Appointment of Counsel re MOTION for Appointment of Counsel #3 filed by Petitioner Johnny Shaw (lh)
April 18, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, filed by Petitioner Johnny Shaw. (lh)
April 18, 2022 Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Johnny Shaw. (lh)
April 18, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim.(Filing Fee $5 Due), filed by Petitioner Johnny Shaw. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of 4 to Petition, #2 Part 3 of 4 to Petition, #3 Part 4 of 4 to Petition) (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnny Shaw v. Bloomfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Johnny Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bloomfield
Represented By: Vincent P LaPietra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?