Hrair Kaladjian v. Joseph R. Biden et al
| Hrair Kaladjian |
| Joseph R. Biden, Jr., U.S. Department of State, Antony Blinken and United States of America |
| 5:2022cv00733 |
| April 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER #2 AND DISMISSING CASE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Accordingly, Plaintiff's application for TRO is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of standing; denying #2 EX PARTE APPLICATION for TRO; denying #2 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order to Show Cause; denying #2 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Preliminary Injunction. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 28 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian, upon Defendant Joseph R. Biden, Jr served on 5/9/2022, answer due 7/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Executed upon the United States Attorney General's Office by certified mail. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (aco) |
| Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian, upon Defendant U.S. Department of State served on 5/9/2022, answer due 7/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorney General's Office by certified mail. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (aco) |
| Filing 26 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian, upon Defendant United States of America served on 5/9/2022, answer due 7/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Attorney General's Office of the United States by certified mail. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (aco) |
| Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian, upon Defendant Antony Blinken served on 5/9/2022, answer due 7/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorney General's Office by certified mail. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (aco) |
| Filing 24 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian, upon Defendant United States of America served on 5/9/2022, answer due 7/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Executed upon the United States Attorney's Office by certified mail. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (aco) |
| Filing 23 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian, upon Defendant U.S. Department of State served on 5/9/2022, answer due 7/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Executed upon the United States Attorney's Office by certified mail. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (aco) |
| Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian, upon Defendant Joseph R. Biden, Jr served on 5/9/2022, answer due 7/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by certified mail. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (aco) |
| Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian, upon Defendant Antony Blinken served on 5/9/2022, answer due 7/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (aco) |
| Filing 19 REPLY MEMORANDUM in Support of Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue #2 filed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian. (gk) |
| Filing 18 OPPOSITION re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order to Show Cause re: Re Preliminary Injunction EX PARTE APPLICATION for Preliminary Injunction re Should not issue #2 filed by Defendants Joseph R. Biden, Jr, Antony Blinken, U.S. Department of State, United States of America. (Attorney Paul B La Scala added to party Joseph R. Biden, Jr(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B La Scala added to party Antony Blinken(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B La Scala added to party U.S. Department of State(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B La Scala added to party United States of America(pty:dft))(La Scala, Paul) |
| Filing 17 FURTHER DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF HRAIR KALADJIAN REGARDING PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER #2 filed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian. (lom) |
| Filing 16 DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF HRAIR KALADJIAN REGARDING EXIGENCY OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, AND SERVICE OF TRO APPLICATION #2 filed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian. (lom) |
| Filing 15 FURTHER MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE #2 filed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian. (lom) |
|
Filing 14
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
|
Filing 13
IN CHAMBERS ORDER/TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: Plaintiff shall serve the government with his application for a temporary restraining order immediately and advise the government that their opposition to the TRO is due by Tuesday, May 3, 2022. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 12 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Joseph R. Biden, Jr. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Antony Blinken. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant U.S. Department of State. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant United States of America. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Hrair Kaladjian in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order #2 filed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause why a Preliminary Injunction re Should not issue #2 filed by Plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause why a Preliminary Injunction should not issue, filed by plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian. (ghap) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/28/2022: #1 Lodged Proposed Order Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause why a Preliminary Injunction should not issue) (ghap). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Joseph R. Biden, Jr, Antony Blinken, U.S. Department of State, United States of America.Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar.(Filing fee $ 402:PAID), filed by plaintiff Hrair Kaladjian. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
