Michael Crosby v. Rico Groups 7 et al
| Michael Crosby |
| Rico Groups 7, SOS SAG California, Sammys Ranch and Casa De Moble Storage |
| 5:2022cv00749 |
| May 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb: Denying #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). This case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (twdb)
|
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (lh) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Michael Crosby. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Casa De Moble Storage, Rico Groups 7, SOS SAG California, Sammys Ranch. Case assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. Filed by Plaintiff Michael Crosby. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
