Elizabeth Dean v. Enhanced Recovery Company LLC
| ELIZABETH DEAN |
| Enhanced Recovery Company LLC |
| 5:2022cv00761 |
| May 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) (A)(ii) filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company LLC.(Rapoport, Gregg) |
| Filing 16 DECLARATION of Gregg A. Rapoport Re: (1) Plaintiff's Dismissal of State Court Action; and (2) Service of Process on Plaintiff, filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company LLC. (Rapoport, Gregg) |
| Filing 15 Mail Returned addressed to Elizabeth Dean re Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference #11 . (lom) |
| Filing 14 Mail Returned addressed to Elizabeth Dean re Order #10 . (lom) |
| Filing 13 Mail Returned addressed to Elizabeth Dean re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint #8 . (lom) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: NOTICE TO PARTIES by District John W. Holcomb. Effective Monday, May 23, 2022, Judge John W. Holcomb will be located in the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, Courtroom 9D, on the 9th Floor, located at 411 W. 4th Street, Santa Ana, California 92701-4516. All Court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 9D of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse unless otherwise ordered by the Court. All required mandatory chambers copies shall be delivered and placed in the drop box located on the 9th Floor of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse. Judge Holcomb's Courtroom Deputy Clerk, may be reached at JWH_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John W. Holcomb. Scheduling Conference set for 7/8/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
|
|
Filing 10
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
|
| Filing 9 Text Only Entry - IN CHAMBERS by Judge John W. Holcomb: Notice Regarding Electronic Document Submission System for People Without Lawyers. People who are not represented by attorneys may now submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System ("EDSS") instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. EDSS is not the same as filing documents electronically in the Court's CM/ECF System. Registration is not required to use EDSS and you do not need a PACER account; only internet access and an e-mail address are required. Attorneys may not use EDSS to submit documents on behalf of their clients. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company LLC.(Rapoport, Gregg) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:22-cv-00761 JWH(SHKx). (rn) |
| Filing 5 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Rapoport, Gregg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (rolm) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Enhanced Recovery Company LLC., filed by plaintiff Elizabeth Dean. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 04/04/2022 AS EXHIBIT A AS ATTACHMENT 1-1 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (rolm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company LLC, identifying ERC Holdings, LLC. (Rapoport, Gregg) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company LLC. (Rapoport, Gregg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number SCPS2200292 Receipt No: ACACDC-33239282 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit State Court Instructions) (Attorney Gregg A. Rapoport added to party Enhanced Recovery Company LLC(pty:dft))(Rapoport, Gregg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Elizabeth Dean v. Enhanced Recovery Company LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ELIZABETH DEAN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Enhanced Recovery Company LLC | |
| Represented By: | Gregg A. Rapoport |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
