Teresa Hicks v. Wal Mart Real Estate Business Trust et al
| Teresa Hicks |
| WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, DOES 1-10 and Wal Mart Real Estate Business Trust |
| 5:2022cv00777 |
| May 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Karen L. Stevenson. New Case Number 2:22-cv-03113 AB(KLSx). (sh) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Teresa Hicks, (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Teresa Hicks. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Teresa Hicks. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33252909 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Teresa Hicks. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party Teresa Hicks(pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
