Hayden Gragnano v. TGI Fridays Inc.
| Hayden Gragnano |
| TGI Fridays Inc. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 5:2022cv00801 |
| May 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| John D Early |
| Sheri Pym |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Notice filed by Defendant TGI Fridays Inc.. to Plaintiff Hayden Gragnano re: Filing of Motion to Consolidate in Related McCollum Action (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Monroe, Amanda) |
Filing 17
ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Notice of Motion to Consolidate #15 , for the following reasons: (1) Incorrect event selected. Correct event is (See Notice to Filer of Deficiencies #16 ); (2) Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely; (3) Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment; (4) Filer used the event Notice (other); which does not prompt user to set hearing before judge; Proposed Order must be filed as separate attachment to efiled "MOTION" and Word version emailed to Judge Slaughter generic email address FWS_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. (jp)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Consolidate Cases - under Category - Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests. (2) Hearing information is missing. (3) Filer used the event Notice (other); which does not prompt the user to set a hearing before the judge; (4) Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. (5) Proposed Order shall be filed as separate attachment to the e-filed "MOTION" and e-mailed to Judge Slaughter generic email addresses a WordPerfect or Microsoft Word version of the document. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
| Filing 15 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 6/10/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #17 ] - NOTICE OF MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASE NUMBER 8:22-cv-00392 FWS (JDEx) AND THIS ACTION FOR ALL PURPOSES filed by Defendant TGI Fridays Inc.. (Monroe, Amanda). Modified on 6/10/2022 (jp). |
|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 7/28/2022 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
|
Filing 13
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
| Filing 12 Certificate of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Monroe, Amanda) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:22-cv-00392-FWS (JDEx). Case transferred from Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym to Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:22-cv-00801-FWS (JDEx). Signed by Judge Fred W. Slaughter (ap)
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Sheri Pym. New Case Number 5:22-cv-00801 JGB (SPx). (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant TGI Fridays Inc. in Riverside Superior Court on 5/9/2022, attached to Monroe Decl as Exhibit B.(jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff TGI Fridays Inc. in Riverside Superior Court on 3/25/2022, attached to Monroe Decl as as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties (Shortz, Lara) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant TGI FRIDAYS INC., a New York corporation. (Shortz, Lara) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant TGI FRIDAYS INC., a New York corporation (Shortz, Lara) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Amanda K. Monroe, Esq. re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant TGI FRIDAYS INC., a New York corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Shortz, Lara) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Jennifer Rote re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant TGI FRIDAYS INC., a New York corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Shortz, Lara) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court of California, case number CVRI2201229 Receipt No: ACACDC-33275950 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant TGI FRIDAYS INC., a New York corporation. (Attorney Lara Ani Hourie Shortz added to party TGI FRIDAYS INC., a New York corporation(pty:dft))(Shortz, Lara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
