Shannon C. Dyell v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| Shannon C Dyell and Shannon C. Dyell |
| Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 5:2022cv00849 |
| May 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Shannon C. Dyell, re Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA,, #11 Summons and Complaint to USAO served on 6/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 1, #2 2)(Rosales, Steven) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV22-849 SHK on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Shannon C. Dyell. (Rosales, Steven) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shannon C. Dyell, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 5/31/2022, answer due 8/29/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of Regional Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 1, #2 2)(Rosales, Steven) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Lynn M Harada added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Harada, Lynn) |
| Filing 9 60 Days DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to dft Kilolo Kijakazi. (dc) |
Filing 8
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION upon filing of the complaint by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (dc)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . (dc)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Shannon C Dyell, (Rosales, Steven) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Shannon C Dyell. (Rosales, Steven) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Shannon C Dyell. (Rosales, Steven) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Shannon C Dyell. (Rosales, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Shannon C Dyell. (Attorney Steven G Rosales added to party Shannon C Dyell(pty:pla))(Rosales, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
