Tarek Fazel v. Kilolo Kijakazi
Tarek Fazel |
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi |
5:2022cv00894 |
May 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Gail J Standish |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV22-894 GJS on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Margaret Branick-Abilla added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Branick-Abilla, Margaret) |
Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Tarek Fazel. (Rosales, Steven) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tarek Fazel, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 6/8/2022, answer due 9/6/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of Regional Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 1, #2 2)(Rosales, Steven) |
Filing 10 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. *SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS* (et) |
Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #5 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (et) |
Filing 8 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: Granting #1 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (et) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (ghap) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #5 filed by Plaintiff Tarek Fazel. (Rosales, Steven) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Tarek Fazel.(Rosales, Steven) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #1 . The following error(s) was found: You have attempted to open this case electronically but have failed to upload successfully the required PDF version of any initiating document, such as a complaint or notice of removal. You must file an initiating document within two business days of this notice or the docket for this case number will be closed. (ghap) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Tarek Fazel, (Rosales, Steven) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Tarek Fazel. (Rosales, Steven) |
Filing 1 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Tarek Fazel. (Attorney Steven G Rosales added to party Tarek Fazel(pty:pla)) (Rosales, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.