Miguel Angel Samperio v. Gruma Corporation et al
| Miguel Angel Samperio |
| Gruma Corporation a Nevada corporation doing business as Mission Foods and Does 1 through 50 |
| 5:2022cv00969 |
| June 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE: REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The Court hereby orders as follows: The Status Conference and Defendant's Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration are continued to September 26, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. RE: Stipulation to Continue, #20 . (aco)
|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION to Continue Status Conference and Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration from August 15, 2022 to December 27, 2022 or any post-mediation date at the Court's convenience. filed by Plaintiff Miguel Angel Samperio. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fernandez, Isandra) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The Court having considered Defendant GRUMA CORPORATION dba MISSION FOODS' Ex Parte Application and any opposition finds that notice was properly given and good cause exists and hereby GRANTS Defendant's Ex Parte Application and IT IS ORDERED: The Initial Status Conference in the above-entitled action shall be continued from July 18, 2022 to August 15, 2022 at 3:00 p.m. before the Honorable Stephen V. Wilson. (rolm)
|
| Filing 18 DECLARATION of Dan M. Forman in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Initial Status Conference from July 18, 2022 to on or after August 15, 2022 #16 filed by Defendant Gruma Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Forman, Dan) |
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Support of EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Initial Status Conference from July 18, 2022 to on or after August 15, 2022 #16 filed by Defendant Gruma Corporation. (Forman, Dan) |
| Filing 16 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Initial Status Conference from July 18, 2022 to on or after August 15, 2022 filed by defendant Gruma Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Forman, Dan) |
| Filing 15 DECLARATION of Dan M. Forman (Executed) in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #11 and Dismiss Action filed by Defendant Gruma Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Forman, Dan) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #11 and Dismiss Action filed by Defendant Gruma Corporation. (Forman, Dan) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #11 and Dismiss Action filed by Defendant Gruma Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Forman, Dan) |
| Filing 12 DECLARATION of Dan M. Forman in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #11 and Dismiss Action filed by Defendant Gruma Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Forman, Dan) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by defendant Gruma Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 8/15/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Forman, Dan) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 7/18/2022 at 03:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
|
Filing 9
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Gruma Corporation, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Declaration #2 , Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #4 served on 6/10/2022. (Forman, Dan) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-00969 SVW (SPx). (jtil) |
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Gruma Corporation, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Declaration #2 served on 6-10-2022. (Forman, Dan) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Gruma Corporation, (Forman, Dan) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Horacio Gaitan re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 In Support of filed by Defendant Gruma Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Forman, Dan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVSB2205552 Receipt No: ACACDC-33448888 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Gruma Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Dan Forman added to party Gruma Corporation(pty:dft))(Forman, Dan) |
| COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Miguel Angel Samperio in San Bernardino Superior Court on 4/11/2022, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
