Roy Dandridge et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
| Roy Dandridge and Debbie Dandridge |
| Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Does 1-50, Inclusive |
| 5:2022cv00985 |
| June 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| George H Wu |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER by Judge George H. Wu. The parties have filed a Joint Scheduling Conference Report ("Report," ECF No. 19). As stated therein, "Defendant filed Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike on July 15, 2022. Plaintiffs elected to amend their pleading and will file a First Amended Complaint on August 1, 2022. Defendant will likely file another Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike thereafter." Report at 2. In light thereof, the Court continues the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) scheduling conference from August 4, 2022 to September 26, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are to file a joint report by September 21. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint #15 , and Defendant's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Complaint #16 , set for hearing on August 15, 2022, are vacated and taken off-calendar. (aco)
|
| Filing 21 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - IN CHAMBERS: by Judge George H. Wu: Counsel are to appear telephonically for Thursday's 08/04/2022 scheduling conference at 8:30 a.m. by contacting the court clerk at javier_gonzalez@cacd.uscourts.gov for dial-in information. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 20 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Does, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Roy Dandridge, Debbie Dandridge(Shapero, Sarah) |
| Filing 19 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE REPORT ; estimated length of trial 3 days, filed by Plaintiffs Debbie Dandridge, Roy Dandridge.. (Shapero, Sarah) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #15 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Complaint #16 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #15 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Complaint #16 and NOTICE OF INTENT to Amend Complaint as a Matter of Course filed by Plaintiff Roy Dandridge. (Warden, Stephanie) |
| Filing 17 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #15 filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-12)(Dailey, Steven) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 8/15/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Dailey, Steven) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 8/15/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Dailey, Steven) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER by Judge George H. Wu. The Court has received the parties' stipulation extending time to answer (ECF No. 12) which provides that Defendant will be given until July 15, 2022 to file its response to the complaint in this matter. Based thereon, the Court continues the July 14, 2022 Rule 26(f) scheduling conference from July 14, 2022 to August 4, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. The parties shall file the Rule 25(f) report by August 1, 2022. (aco)
|
| Filing 13 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - IN CHAMBERS: by Judge George H. Wu: Counsel are to appear telephonically for Thursday's 07/14/2022 scheduling conference at 8:30 a.m. by contacting the court clerk at javier_gonzalez@cacd.uscourts.gov for dial-in information. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 12 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. answer now due 7/15/2022, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc..(Dailey, Steven) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for July 14, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than July 7, 2022. See Local Rule 26-1. (aco)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge George H. Wu. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-00985 GW (SHKx). (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:22-cv-985 JGB (SHKx). (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-50, Inclusive, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Roy Dandridge, Debbie Dandridge. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/12/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2) (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., identifying Credit Suisse First Boston. (Dailey, Steven) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE in Support of Notice of Removal filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-2, #2 Proof of Service)(Dailey, Steven) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Dailey, Steven) |
| Filing 2 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on June 10, 2022. (Dailey, Steven) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number CVRI2201951 Receipt No: ACACDC-33453867 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Summons, #2 Exhibit 2 - Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3 - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit 4 - Notice of Department Assignment) (Attorney Steven M Dailey added to party Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.(pty:dft))(Dailey, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
