Denise Mitchell et al v. City of Barstow et al
| Denise Mitchell and K.M. |
| City of Barstow and DOES 1-10 |
| 5:2022cv01014 |
| June 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for Appointment of Denise Mitchell as Guardian ad Litem for K.M. filed by Plaintiff Denise Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Declaration CONSENT OF NOMINEE OF DENISE MITCHELL, FOR APPOINTMENT AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR MINOR PLAINTIFF K.M., #2 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION OF DENISE MITCHELL, FOR APPOINTMENT AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR MINOR PLAINTIFF K.M.) (Galipo, Dale) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs K.M., Denise Mitchell. (Galipo, Dale) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs K.M., Denise Mitchell, identifying Denise Mitchell, K.M., a minor, and City of Barstow. (Galipo, Dale) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs K.M., Denise Mitchell. (Galipo, Dale) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33501276 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Denise Mitchell, K.M.. (Attorney Dale K Galipo added to party K.M. (pty:pla), Attorney Dale K Galipo added to party Denise Mitchell(pty:pla))(Galipo, Dale) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
