Ryan Camacho v. Caleres, Inc. et al
| Ryan Camacho |
| Caleres, Inc., DOES 1 - 50 and Does 1-50 |
| 5:2022cv01028 |
| June 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. A Scheduling Conference is set for Friday, February 24, 2023 at 10:30 AM. See attached Order for details. (hc)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Complaint - (Discovery), Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint)(Giddens, Brent) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Caleres, Inc., OF NOTICE TO STATE COURT AND ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT served on June 24, 2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wulffson, Todd) |
| Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON upon filing of the complaint. (droj) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:22-cv-01028-JLS-(SPx). (dve)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge James V. Selna. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-01028 JVS (SPx). (sh) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Caleres, Inc.[STATE COURT FILE DATE NOT INDICATED SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBIT B TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Caleres, Inc., Does.Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Ryan Camacho.[FILED IN STATE COURT 04/27/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Caleres, Inc. (Giddens, Brent) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Caleres, Inc., (Giddens, Brent) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Caleres, Inc.. (Giddens, Brent) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Thomas Burke re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Caleres, Inc.. (Giddens, Brent) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Amy S. Williams re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Caleres, Inc.. (Giddens, Brent) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardo Sup. Ct., case number CIVSB2208565 Receipt No: CCACDC-33517695 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Caleres, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-Caleres Answer to Complaint, #3 Exhibit C-Service Docs) (Attorney Brent Mathew Giddens added to party Caleres, Inc.(pty:dft))(Giddens, Brent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
