Fidela Mortz v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. et al
| Fidela Mortz |
| Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 5:2022cv01091 |
| July 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Sheri Pym |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #13 served on August 19, 2022. (Breuer, Andrea) |
Filing 13
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Joint Case Management Statement filed by Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc... (Breuer, Andrea) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Robert B. Gibson on behalf of Plaintiff Fidela Mortz. Filed by Plaintiff Fidela Mortz (Attorney Robert B Gibson added to party Fidela Mortz(pty:pla))(Gibson, Robert) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. Scheduling Conference set for 9/23/2022 at 01:00 PM before Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
|
Filing 9
REASSIGNMENT ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: Please refer to Order for complete details., (iva)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani to Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:22-cv-01091 SSS(SPx). (rn) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Breuer, Andrea) |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.. (Breuer, Andrea) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (Attachments: #1 CV11-C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., identifying Dollar Tree, Inc.. (Breuer, Andrea) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc... (Breuer, Andrea) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.. (Breuer, Andrea) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVSB2207688 Receipt No: ACACDC-33564613 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D to Notice of Removal) (Attorney Andrea Breuer added to party Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.(pty:dft))(Breuer, Andrea) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., Does 1 through 100, inclusive, filed by Plaintiff Fidela Mortz. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/13/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
