Abraham Bernal v. Krones, Inc. et al
| Abraham Bernal |
| Fanuc America Corporation, Krones, Inc. and Does 1 to 10, inclusive |
| 5:2022cv01094 |
| July 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Receipt of LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT. (aco) |
| Filing 8 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino. (aco) |
| Filing 7 MINUTES OF STATUS CONFERENCE by ZOOM held before Judge Percy Anderson. Plaintiff's counsel moved to remand the action to the San Bernardino County Superior Court based on procedural defects in the Notice of Removal. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to remand for the reasons discussed. See 28 U.S.C. 1446(a). Therefore, this action is remanded to San Bernardino County Superior Court, Case No. CIVSB2209387, for failure to satisfy statutory removal requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Katie Thibodeaux. (aco) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym to Judge Percy Anderson for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:22-cv-01094 PA(KKx). (rn) |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by PLAINTIFF Abraham Bernal. (Jivalagian, Caspar) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Abraham Bernal, upon Defendant Krones, Inc. served on 6/2/2022, answer due 6/23/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC-Lawyers Incorporating service c/o Trudy Desbien-Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/6/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C) (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Fanuc America Corporation. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 100, inclusive, Fanuc America Corporation, Krones, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Abraham Bernal. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/6/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Fanuc America Corporation, identifying FANUC Corporation. (Schuler, Ian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Fanuc America Corporation. (Schuler, Ian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Receipt No: BCACDC-33564977 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Fanuc America Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Ariel N. Redfern ISO Notice of Removal) (Attorney Ian G. Schuler added to party Fanuc America Corporation(pty:dft))(Schuler, Ian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
