Maria Silvia Christina Santana v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| Maria Silvia Cristina Santana |
| Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 5:2022cv01128 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 5:22-cv-01128 JC on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #12 , Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final #10 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rn) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Maria Silvia Cristina Santana. (Haley, Denise) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Maria Silvia Cristina Santana, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 7/21/2022, answer due 9/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of Regional Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 1, #2 2)(Haley, Denise) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Marla K. Letellier added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Letellier, Marla) |
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER [Social Security] by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (hr) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby: GRANTED. (rolm)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Maria Silvia Cristina Santana, (Haley, Denise) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Maria Silvia Cristina Santana. (Haley, Denise) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Maria Silvia Cristina Santana. (Haley, Denise) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Maria Silvia Cristina Santana. (Haley, Denise) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Maria Silvia Cristina Santana. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Attorney Denise Bourgeois Haley added to party Maria Silvia Cristina Santana(pty:pla))(Haley, Denise) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
