Derrick Deon Horton v. Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility
Petitioner: Derrick Deon Horton
Respondent: Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility
Case Number: 5:2022cv01213
Filed: July 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, ORDERING Letter submitted by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton received on August 17, 2022 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: L.R. 83-2.5. Document is duplicative of docket entry no. 15. (es)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, ORDERING Letter submitted by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton received on 8/29/2022 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: L.R. 83-2.5. No letters to the judge. (es)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, ORDERING Letter submitted by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton received on August 17, 2022 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: L.R. 83-2.5. Document is duplicative of docket entry no. 15. (es)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, ORDERING Letter submitted by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton received on August 15, 2022 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: L.R. 83-2.5. Document is duplicative of docket entry no. 14. (es)
August 17, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY filed by petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (es)
August 15, 2022 Filing 14 REQUEST for Leave to Serve Civil Rights Complaint filed by petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (es)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, ORDERING Letter submitted by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton received on August 8, 2022 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: L.R. 83-2.5. Document is duplicative of docket entry no. 12. (es)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, ORDERING Letter submitted by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton received on 8/8/2022 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Document is duplicative of docket entry no. 10. (et)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, ORDERING Lettter submitted by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton received on 7/28/2022 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Document is duplicative of docket entry no. 7. (et)
August 8, 2022 Filing 10 Notice filed by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (et)
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth ORDERING Letter submitted by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton received on 7/25/2022 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk. (es)
July 28, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION to Freeze Accounts filed by petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (es)
July 25, 2022 Filing 9 Notice filed by petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (es)
July 25, 2022 Filing 6 SECOND SUPPLEMENT to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 filed by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (es)
July 20, 2022 Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 filed by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (es)
July 12, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (et)
July 11, 2022 Filing 3 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (et)
July 11, 2022 Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (et)
July 11, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth., filed by Petitioner Derrick Deon Horton. (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Derrick Deon Horton v. Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Derrick Deon Horton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?