Andrew Crossman v. County of Riverside et al
Andrew Crossman |
County of Riverside, Riverside University Health System, Richard Judd and DOES 1 through 25 |
5:2022cv01226 |
July 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sheri Pym |
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants County of Riverside, Richard Judd, Riverside University Health System. (car) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Andrew Crossman, (Schlueter, Peter) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Andrew Crossman. (Schlueter, Peter) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Andrew Crossman. (Schlueter, Peter) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33627523 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Andrew Crossman. (Attorney Peter B Schlueter added to party Andrew Crossman(pty:pla))(Schlueter, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.