Marco Cabezas v. Flint Group, LLC et al
| Jose Gomez and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| Marco Cabezas and FLINT GROUP, LLC |
| 5:2022cv01265 |
| July 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #13 . Having considered the Ghazali factors, and in light of Plaintiffs deemed consent to theMotion, the court finds that dismissal of the FAC is appropriate. Accordingly, the court GRANTS Defendants Motion and DISMISSES the action without prejudice. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #13 filed by Defendant Flint Group, LLC. (Samuel, Robin) |
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: granting #12 Non-Resident Attorney Remy D. Snead APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Flint Group, LLC, designating Robin J. Samuel as local counsel. (lom)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 9/23/2022 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Flint Group, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 8/26/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Proposed Order) (Samuel, Robin) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Remy D. Snead to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Flint Group, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33705441) filed by Defendant Flint Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Samuel, Robin) |
|
Filing 11
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Flint Group, LLC. correcting Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 (Samuel, Robin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Remy Snead. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-01265 FLA (KKx). (car) |
| NON-CONFORMED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Marco Cabezas pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Jose Gomez. Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Flint Group, LLC, Jose Gomez. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Marco Cabezas. Filed in State Court on 1/25/2022 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) Modified on 7/21/2022 (car). |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Flint Group, LLC amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiff Marco Cabezas. Submitted with Attachment 3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant FLINT GROUP, LLC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on July 20, 2022. (Samuel, Robin) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FLINT GROUP, LLC, (Samuel, Robin) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Dianne Haven re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Movant FLINT GROUP, LLC. (Samuel, Robin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant FLINT GROUP, LLC. (Samuel, Robin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, case number CIV SB 2201835 Receipt No: ACACDC-33664706 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FLINT GROUP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Request for Dismissal of Jose Gomez, #3 Exhibit C - First Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Proof of Service of First Amended Complaint and Request For Dismiss of Jose Gomez) (Attorney Robin J Samuel added to party FLINT GROUP, LLC(pty:bkmov))(Samuel, Robin) Modified on 7/21/2022 (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
