Ashley Heather Sanchez v. Kia America, Inc. et al
| Ashley Heather Sanchez |
| Kia America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 5:2022cv01277 |
| July 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff's Attorney Ashley Heather Sanchez.. (Morrow, Neal) |
Filing 10
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events Other Filings Pretrial and Trial Documents - Select - Jury Demand. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 8 Notice Plaintiff's Demand for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Counsel Ashley Heather Sanchez. (Morrow, Neal) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. Scheduling Conference set for 11/4/2022 at 01:00 PM before Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (rolm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (rolm) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-01277 SSS (SPx). (rolm) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Kia America, Inc., filed by plaintiff Ashley Heather Sanchez. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/20/22 ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT 1 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (rolm) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND filed by defendant Kia America, Inc. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON DATE NOT INDICATED. SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT 2 ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (rolm) |
| Filing 3 Kia America, Inc.'s Notice and Certificate of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Kia America, Inc., identifying Kia America, Inc.; Kia Motor Corp.; Ashley Heather Sanchez. (Senior, Julian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Kia America, Inc.. (Senior, Julian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVSB2210256 Receipt No: BCACDC-33674273 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Kia America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF JULIAN G. SENIOR, IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT KIA AMERICA, INC.S NOTICE OF REMOVAL, #2 Exhibit SUPPORTING EXHIBITS 1-3 TO THE DECLARATION OF JULIAN G. SENIOR IN SUPPORT OF KIA AMERICA, INC.S NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (Attorney Julian G Senior added to party Kia America, Inc. (pty:dft))(Senior, Julian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
