Ruben Mejia v. California State University San Bernardino
| Ruben Mejia |
| California State University San Bernardino, LaKenya Simon West, Diana Minor, Jaime Espinoza and Cecil Howard |
| 5:2022cv01311 |
| July 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [DKT. 9] AND DENYINGPLAINTIFFS AMENDED REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [DKT. 11] by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: The Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint [Dkt. 9] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Plaintiffs Amended IFP Request [Dkt. 11] is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (shb)
|
| Filing 11 AMENDED REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Petitioner Ruben Mejia. (shb) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ruben Mejia, identifying Corporate Parent Inga Rodriguez, Other Affiliate Sarah Calderon, Other Affiliate Natalie Clearly, Other Affiliate Jason L Wilbley, Other Affiliate Jeanne Durr, Other Affiliate Jaime Espinoza for Ruben Mejia. (shb) Modified on 8/10/2022 (shb). |
| Filing 9 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants California State University San Bernardino, Diana Minor(individual capacity), Diana Minor(official capacity), LaKenya Simon West(official capacity), LaKenya Simon West(individual capacity); Party Cecil Howard (individual capacity), Jaime Espinoza (individual capacity) and Jaime Espinoza (official capacity) terminated amending Complaint - (Referred), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Ruben Mejia(shb) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, [DKT. 3] by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: The Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1. Plaintiffs IFP Request is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because the action fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint by September 2, 2022. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint by that date, the Court will dismiss the action with prejudice. 3. If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, he may re-file his IFP Request and is DIRECTED to correct the above-identified deficiencies with respect to Questions 1(b), 2, and 6. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for more information. (shb)
|
| Filing 7 Supporting documents in support of Claim - (Referred), #1 filed by Plaintiff Ruben Mejia. (shb) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Ruben Mejia. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ruben Mejia. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Ruben Mejia filed against Defendants California State University San Bernardino, Jaime Espinoza, Cecil Howard, Diana Minor, LaKenya Simon West. Case assigned to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (Attachments: #1 CV71, #2 Summons Request) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
