Sara Alsrihin et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Sara Alsrihin and Tariq Alwaqfi |
United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, Santa Ana Field Office, Trung Vo, Christopher A. Wray, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur M. Jaddou |
5:2022cv01422 |
August 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tariq Alwaqfi, Sara Alsrihin, upon Defendant Christopher A. Wray served on 8/22/2022, answer due 10/21/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tariq Alwaqfi, Sara Alsrihin, upon Defendant Trung Vo served on 8/22/2022, answer due 10/21/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tariq Alwaqfi, Sara Alsrihin, upon Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 8/22/2022, answer due 10/21/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tariq Alwaqfi, Sara Alsrihin, upon Defendant Santa Ana Field Office served on 8/22/2022, answer due 10/21/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tariq Alwaqfi, Sara Alsrihin, upon Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas served on 8/22/2022, answer due 10/21/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tariq Alwaqfi, Sara Alsrihin, upon Defendant Ur M. Jaddou served on 8/22/2022, answer due 10/21/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tariq Alwaqfi, Sara Alsrihin, upon Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security served on 8/22/2022, answer due 10/21/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 14 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 13 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Santa Ana Field Office, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Trung Vo and Christopher A. Wray. (Attachments: #1 UJaddou, #2 AMayorkas, #3 Santa Ana FO, #4 USCIS, #5 TVo, #6 CWray) (jtil) |
Filing 12 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (jtil) |
Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Sara Alsrihin, Tariq Alwaqfi. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Sara Alsrihin, Tariq Alwaqfi. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Sara Alsrihin, Tariq Alwaqfi. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Sara Alsrihin, Tariq Alwaqfi. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Sara Alsrihin, Tariq Alwaqfi. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Sara Alsrihin, Tariq Alwaqfi. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Sara Alsrihin, Tariq Alwaqfi. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sara Alsrihin, Tariq Alwaqfi, (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Sara Alsrihin, Tariq Alwaqfi. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33792920 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Tariq Alwaqfi, Sara Alsrihin. (Attorney Salah O. Khatib added to party Sara Alsrihin(pty:pla), Attorney Salah O. Khatib added to party Tariq Alwaqfi(pty:pla))(Khatib, Salah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.