Amalfi Viafara v. General Motors LLC et al
| Amalfi Viafara |
| General Motors LLC, Rubidoux Motor Co. and Rubidoux Motor Co. a California Corporation doing business as Dutton Motor Company |
| 5:2022cv01447 |
| August 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Sheri Pym |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Scheduling Conference set for 12/12/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (tc)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant General Motors LLC #13 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Answer and/or Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Motion to Dismiss on file. (twdb) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant General Motors LLC General Motors LLC, (Shugart, Jonathan) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant General Motors LLC.(Attorney Jonathan M Shugart added to party General Motors LLC(pty:dft))(Shugart, Jonathan) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant General Motors LLC filed by Plaintiff Amalfi Viafara. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amy R. Rotman) (Rotman, Amy) |
|
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Amalfi Viafara pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Rubidoux Motor Co.. (Rotman, Amy) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Amalfi Viafara, upon Defendant General Motors LLC served on 8/18/2022, answer due 9/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC - Koy Saechao - Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons returned. (Wirtz, Richard) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants General Motors LLC, Rubidoux Motor Co.. (Attachments: #1 General Motors, LLC) (sh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Amalfi Viafara, identifying Plaintiff Amalfi Viafara, Defendant General Motors, LLC, and Defendant Rubidoux Motor Co.. (Wirtz, Richard) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Amalfi Viafara. (Wirtz, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Amalfi Viafara. (Wirtz, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Amalfi Viafara. (Wirtz, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33820161 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Amalfi Viafara. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Attorney Richard M Wirtz added to party Amalfi Viafara(pty:pla))(Wirtz, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
