Arisha Byars v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc. et al
| Arisha Byars |
| Sterling Jewelers, Inc., DOES 1 through 25, and Does 1 through 25, inclusive |
| 5:2022cv01456 |
| August 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Sheri Pym |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 8
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sterling Jewelers, Inc. (et)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (et)
|
|
Filing 4
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Arisha Byars. (Ferrell, Scott)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Arisha Byars, (Ferrell, Scott)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Arisha Byars. (Ferrell, Scott)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33834096 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Arisha Byars. (Attorney Scott J Ferrell added to party Arisha Byars(pty:pla))(Ferrell, Scott)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
