Felix J. Jackson v. Calpers Death and Survivor Benefits
Felix J. Jackson |
Calpers Death and Survivor Benefits and Calpers Death and Survivor Benefits Dispersement |
5:2022cv01588 |
September 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sheri Pym |
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT [DKT. 12] DENYING PLAINTIFFS AMENDED REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [DKT. 11] by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: Because Jackson is unable to demonstrate to this Court that it has subject matter jurisdiction over his claim, Jackson has failed to show that his claim properly belongs in federal court rather than state court. Therefore, Jacksons Amended Complaint [Dkt. 12] is DISMISSED and his Amended Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Dkt. 11] is DENIED. Accordingly, JacksonsRequest for Appointment of Counsel [Dkt. 3] and Application to file documentselectronically [Dkt. 13] is also DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. MS JS-6 (shb) |
Filing 13 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Felix J. Jackson. (shb) |
Filing 12 AMENDED AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Calpers Death and Survivor Benefits Dispersement; Party Calpers Death and Survivor Benefits terminated amending Complaint - (Discovery), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Felix J. Jackson(shb) |
Filing 11 AMENDED REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Felix J. Jackson. (shb) |
Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [DKTS. #2 & #9 ] by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. Because Jackson is unable to show the Court has subject matter jurisdiction, Jackson's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. However, the Court grants leave for Jackson to file an amended complaint curing his lack of subject matter jurisdiction on or before October 13, 2022. If Jackson still wishes to request an application to proceed in forma pauperis, he must refile his application with his amended complaint. Should an amended complaint not be filed by October 13, 2022, the matter will be dismissed in its entirety. (lom) |
Filing 9 AMENDED REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Felix J. Jackson. (es) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES (Local Rule 7.1-1) filed by plaintiff Felix J. Jackson (es) |
Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT (Discovery), #1 filed by Plaintiff Felix J. Jackson. (es) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (sh) |
Filing 3 REQUEST for Appointment of Counsel filed by Plaintiff Felix J. Jackson. (sh) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Plaintiff Felix J. Jackson. (sh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Calpers Death and Survivor Benefits.Case assigned to Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Felix J. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.