Guoxia Xiao v. Jaddou Ur Mendoza et al
| Guoxia Xiao |
| Jaddou Ur Mendoza, Susan M. Curda and Corina A. Luna |
| 5:2022cv01601 |
| September 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Susan M. Curda, Corina A. Luna, Jaddou Ur Mendoza. (et) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (et) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff GUOXIA XIAO, (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff GUOXIA XIAO. (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff GUOXIA XIAO. (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33960036 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff GUOXIA XIAO. (Attorney Joel E Spence added to party GUOXIA XIAO(pty:pla))(Spence, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
