Vitan Amaya v. Rancho Cucamonga Court
| Vitan Amaya |
| Rancho Cucamonga Court |
| 5:2022cv01613 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STATEMENT filed by Petitioner Vitan Amaya (es) |
| Filing 12 GRANTING RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE MOTION TO DISMISS OR ANSWER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: granting #11 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File. It is hereby ORDERED as follows: The deadline for filing a Motion to Dismiss the Petition is extended to November 14, 2022. Petitioner's reply to any Motion to Dismiss is due 20 days after the date of service of the Motion. The deadline for filing an Answer to the Petition is extended to November 29, 2022. Petitioners reply to an Answer is due 30 days after the date of service of the Answer. (et) |
| Filing 11 First APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Motion to Dismiss or Answer filed by Respondent Rancho Cucamonga Court. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rogers, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel Brian Rogers counsel for Respondent Rancho Cucamonga Court. Adding Daniel Brian Rogers as counsel of record for Rancho Cucamonga Court for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent Daniel Brian Rogers. (Attorney Daniel Brian Rogers added to party Rancho Cucamonga Court(pty:res))(Rogers, Daniel) |
Filing 9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: the documents listed below were improperly filed for the following reasons: Duplicate filing; therefore, the following document(s) shall be STRICKEN from the record and shall not be considered by the Court: Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #7 . (es)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: Other error(s) with document(s): Duplicate Filing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (HABEAS) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Re REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by petitioner Vitan Amaya #2 . On the question of indigency, the Court finds that Petitioner: has not submitted enough information for the Court to tell if Petitioner is able to pay the filing fee. This is what is missing: The certification must be completed by an authorized officer of the institution. The petition does not contain a response to question 3. Ruling on the Request is POSTPONED FOR 30 DAYS so that Petitioner may provide additional information. (lc)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Respondent should file and serve an answer to the Petition within 45 days of the date of this Order. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed within 30 days of the date of the Order. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1.Petition, #2 Attachment 2.Consent) (es)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Vitan Amaya. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Petitioner Vitan Amaya. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth.(Filing fee $ 5:FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Vitan Amaya. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vitan Amaya v. Rancho Cucamonga Court | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Vitan Amaya | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Rancho Cucamonga Court | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Brian Rogers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
