Chino Valley Unified School District v. G.B. et al
| Chino Valley Unified School District |
| Rebecca Sabatino and Rudy Buruca |
| G.B. |
| James DeRoche |
| 5:2022cv01618 |
| September 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 40
ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2) #39 by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. It is ordered that this action is dismissed, with prejudice, in its entirety. (lom)
|
| Filing 39 STIPULATION for Order of Dismissal Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2) filed by Plaintiff Chino Valley Unified School District. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order of Dismissal)(Stein, Shiva) |
|
Filing 38
SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Sunshine S. Sykes: In light of the email of May 19, 2023, from Plaintiff's counsel's office, notifying the Court of the parties' settlement, this action is placed in inactive status. By July 21, 2023, the parties shall file either (1) a Stipulation of Dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); (2) a Stipulation for an Order of Dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2); or (3) a motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. The parties' failure to comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of this action on July 24, 2023. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action, and this Order shall not prejudice any party. All previously set deadlines and dates are hereby VACATED. (JS-6) THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 37 MEDIATION REPORT Filed by Mediator (ADR Panel) James DeRoche: Mediation held on April 10, 2023 and the case has been completely settled. With the filing of this Report, the parties are advised that they must notify the trial judge's deputy courtroom clerk of the fact of settlement and to promptly file documents regarding the final disposition of the case. Counsel: Please evaluate the effectiveness of the ADR Program by completing a survey on your mediation experience. To access the survey, click on the following link: #MediationParticipantSurvey(DeRoche, James) |
| Filing 36 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Madeline Lexia Knutson counsel for Counter Claimant G.B., Defendant G.B.. Adding Madeline L. Knutson as counsel of record for Defendants/Counterclaimants G.B., et al. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Counsel for Defendants/Counterclaimants Madeline L. Knutson. (Attorney Madeline Lexia Knutson added to party G.B.(pty:cc), Attorney Madeline Lexia Knutson added to party G.B.(pty:dft))(Knutson, Madeline) |
| Filing 35 MEDIATION REPORT Filed by Mediator (ADR Panel) James DeRoche: Mediation held on April 10, 2023. The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.Counsel: Please evaluate the effectiveness of the ADR Program by completing a survey on your mediation experience. To access the survey, click on the following link: #MediationParticipantSurvey(DeRoche, James) |
| Filing 34 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) James DeRoche has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst) |
| Filing 33 NOTICE OF MEDIATION DATE filed. Mediation set for April 10, 2023.(DeRoche, James) |
|
Filing 32
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than June 1, 2023. The parties shall file a joint report no later than seven (7) days after the ADR proceeding regarding the progress of settlement discussions. (shb)
|
| Filing 31 REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 2 filed. Parties request to appear before a neutral selected from the court's Mediation Panel for mediation. Filed by Plaintiff Chino Valley Unified School District(Stein, Shiva) |
| Filing 30 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that James DeRoche may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. All parties and the Panel Mediator have agreed that the mediation will be held on 4/10/2023 and counsel will submit mediation statements seven (7) calendar days before the session. Filed by Plaintiff Chino Valley Unified School District(Stein, Shiva) |
|
Filing 29
SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Sunshine S. Sykes: In view of the Court's Order [Dkt. 28], granting the parties Stipulation [Dkt. 27], the Court hereby VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for January 13, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 28
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING ADDITIONAL EVENT DATES RELATED TO JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION UNDER THE IDEA, #27 by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: The Court, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS as follows: 1. Standard trial and pretrial procedure would not be appropriate for this matter. As such, the Court orders the following events/dates and identifies page limitations for the related briefings, as indicated below: A. Lodging of administrative record by Plaintiff: May 19, 2023. B. Last day for hearing motions to supplement the record: June 9, 2023. C. Last day for filing of Plaintiffs opening brief (40 pages maximum): July 28, 2023. D. Last day for filing of Defendants responsive brief (40 pages maximum): August 25, 2023E. Last day for filing of Plaintiffs reply brief (20 pages maximum): September 22, 2023. F. Court trial/hearing for oral argument (as necessary): October 23,2023, at 9:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for more information. (shb)
|
| Filing 27 Joint STIPULATION for Order for Additional Event Dates Related to Judicial Review of Administrative Decision Under the IDEA filed by Plaintiff Chino Valley Unified School District. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stein, Shiva) |
| Filing 26 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Plaintiff Chino Valley Unified School District.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet)(Stein, Shiva) |
| Filing 25 ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), Counterclaim #16 filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Chino Valley Unified School District.(D'Amico, Amanda) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. Scheduling Conference set for 1/13/2023 at 01:00 PM before Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: granting #22 PETITION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem, appointing Rebecca Sabatino as Guardian ad Litem for G.B. (hr)
|
| Filing 22 PETITION for Appointment of Rebecca Sabatino as Guardian ad Litem for G.B. filed by Counsel for Defendants/Counterclaimants G.B.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Adams, Timothy) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Counsel for Defendants G.B., (Adams, Timothy) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER AS MOOT #15 by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (lom)
|
| Filing 19 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form, #18 by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. A notice of interested parties shall be filed no later than 5 days from entry of this Order. (iva) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Answer to Complaint and Counterclaim #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 17 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Timothy A Adams counsel for Counter Claimant G.B., Defendant G.B.. Filed by Counsel for Defendants Phillip W. VanAllsburg. (Adams, Timothy) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , COUNTERCLAIM against Chino Valley Unified School District filed by Counsel for Defendants/Counterclaimants G.B..(Adams, Timothy) |
| Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to November 30, 2022 filed by Counsel for Defendants G.B.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer)(Adams, Timothy) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Timothy A Adams counsel for Defendant G.B.. Adding Timothy A. Adams as counsel of record for Defendant G.B. (a minor), by and through her parents, REBECCA SABATINO and RUDY BURUCA for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Counsel for Defendant Timothy A. Adams. (Attorney Timothy A Adams added to party G.B.(pty:dft))(Adams, Timothy) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Chino Valley Unified School District, upon Defendant G.B. acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 9/20/2022, answer due 10/11/2022. (D'Amico, Amanda) |
|
Filing 12
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice (Other) #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 10 Notice CORRECTED Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel filed by Plaintiff Chino Valley Unified School District. (Stein, Shiva) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Shiva E Stein counsel for Plaintiff Chino Valley Unified School District. Adding Shiva E. Stein as counsel of record for Chino Valley Unified School District for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Chino Valley Unified School District. (Attorney Shiva E Stein added to party Chino Valley Unified School District(pty:pla))(Stein, Shiva) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant G.B.. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Chino Valley Unified School District. (D'Amico, Amanda) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chino Valley Unified School District, (D'Amico, Amanda) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chino Valley Unified School District. (D'Amico, Amanda) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by Plaintiff Chino Valley Unified School District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Amanda E D'Amico added to party Chino Valley Unified School District(pty:pla))(D'Amico, Amanda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
