Fullspring, LLC v. Jeannette Moultrie et al
Plaintiff: Fullspring, LLC
Defendant: Jeannette Moultrie and Does 1 to 10
Case Number: 5:2022cv01642
Filed: September 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S Fischer
Referring Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2022 Filing 9 Receipt of Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court. (jp)
September 21, 2022 Filing 8 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Riverside County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Riverside County Superior Court at Corona. Case number: UDCO2200780. (jp)
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer that the Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 is DENIED. This case is REMANDED to state court as explained in the attached statement. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) (jp)
September 20, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
September 20, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
September 19, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Dale S. Fischer. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-1642-DSF-KK. (ghap)
September 19, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Jeannette Moultrie, (ghap)
September 19, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs, filed by defendant Jeannette Moultrie. (ghap)
September 19, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California for County of Riverside, case number UDCO2200780 with CONFORMED FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato., filed by defendant Jeannette Moultrie. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fullspring, LLC v. Jeannette Moultrie et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fullspring, LLC
Represented By: William Edward Windham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeannette Moultrie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?