La Tonya Freeman v. Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C. et al
| La Tonya Freeman |
| Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 5:2022cv01675 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Sheri Pym |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C..(Reid, Edward) |
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/2/2022. (tj)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge John A. Kronstadt. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-01675 JAK (SPx). (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-100, inclusive, Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C., filed by Plaintiff La Tonya Freeman. Filed in State Court on 3/11/2022 Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C., (Reid, Edward) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE filed by Defendant Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C.. (Reid, Edward) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C.. (Reid, Edward) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVSB2204269 Receipt No: ACACDC-34040150 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF EDWARD J. REID IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1332 AND 1441(B) (DIVERSITY JURISDICTION), #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E) (Attorney Edward J Reid added to party Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C.(pty:dft))(Reid, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
